1. The fundamental issue that underlies the debate about net neutrality is whether or not the internet should be run by larger cable and telephone companies who would decide which websites would load the quickest and which ones would take longer to load or be shut down completely in an effort to regulate the growth of the internet.
2. Google and Facebook are two organizations that are in support of net neutrality, some of their arguments are that they want to keep the internet free and to have equal oppurtunities for all website owners not just the ones created by major coporations.
3. AT&T and Comcast are two organizations who are against net neutrality their arguments are that if they regulate the internet in the way that want to (which is controlling the flow of websites based on ownership) it will create the largest variety of choices for consumers. They also belive that it will help to keep the internet under control because it is growing too fast.
4. My opinion about net neutrality is that the internet should remain free for everyone, I don't believe that there is anything fair about what these major coporations want to do, it doesn't seem like anything more than a way for the rich to get richer. The internet should stay as it is, it would unconstitutional to regulate it in this way.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment